||Gareth Jones-CN-DNB-GJ (5mb)
||Gareth Jones DnB 07.05.15 Incls:
*Affidavit from ATO Officer Antony Wallace
*Top 10 Facts about ATO
*Court Evidence ATO is not a Legal Entity
*Extract – Letter from TaxPayers to ATO in March 2011
* Request for PII details “Acting In Commerce“
DUN AND BRADSTREET – A LAWBREAKING PARASITE IN OUR COMMUNITY
CEO – Gareth Jones.
Dun and Bradstreet – Operating in Treason, Fraud and Slavery.
This parasite in our community ‘alleges’ to have rights and jurisdiction over YOU. FALSE.
How does it think it acquired that?
It broke the Law and is using you as a debt slave to generate a profit for itself.
It is wholly false in it’s presumption that you are willingly embroiled in it’s debt slavery game.
Rather, you are engaged in it’s debt slavery game under duress, since any attempt to create a people owned currency, as opposed to the current PRIVATELY owned currency, does result in assassination. Just refer to the history of JFK or Abraham Lincoln.
And if one needs access to community resources that have fallen into corporate hands they must agree to contracts under duress to access such resources. These contracts have nasty parasites lurking in them like Dun and Bradstreet.
Which Maxim of Law does Dun and Bradstreet break to carve out it’s filthy existence from the cobbled slave streets of old London:
PRIVITY OF CONTRACT
1.Doctrine of Privity.
A valid contract (if one exists) is a private relationship between the parties who make it, and no other person can acquire rights or incur liabilities under it.
2. Scope of Doctrine. The Doctrine of Privity has two aspects.
a. No one can acquire rights under a contract to which he is not a party.
b. No one can incur liabilities under a contract to which he is not a party.
CONTRACT LAW is one of the most clear cut and unambiguous LAWS that there is. In many cases the LAW and more specifically CONTRACT LAW insisted upon to be written, that even a lay man, would and could understand it. Thus it is a very solid foundation of LAW.
“NO ONE CAN ACQUIRE RIGHTS UNDER A CONTRACT TO WHICH HE IS NOT A PARTY!”
Let’s see, who is the current nut case occupying the position of CEO for Dun and Bradstreet and inevitably earning far too much money for committing acts of treason, fraud and slavery in community. That would be Gareth Jones.
So today 17.8.15, Dun and Bradstreet entered my life after Telstra SOLD my account to them, like I am it’s peasant slave and it can just do that. So what might Dun and Bradstreet think it has right to do to my life. Well let’s take a look below. The list of HARM and INJURY, is impressive despite a long track record of a weekly payments with Telstra. Ho Hum Telstra, you are the subject of many other posts of your fraudulent contracts that allegedly grant Dun and Bradstreet access to enter my life. How irresponsible are you, and how willing to engage in breaking the law for your fake, fraudulent status as a private corporation with private profits, shareholder dividends and grossly overpaid CEO. Telstra was a community resource. It is gross fraud to allege to be able to sell it back tot he people who already owned it.
So let’s see what costs Dun and Bradstreet have racked up today, 17.8.15 attempting to extort business out of me WITHOUT MY CONSENT.
1) A phone call from 08 8010 7000 at 12.25pm AWST, attempting to create joynder to the legal fiction thus deeming me a slave: $1 000 000
2) A txt message at 1.10pm AWST alleging to have very important business to discuss with me: $1 000 000
3) An email delivered to my inbox at 12.59pm AWST telling me:
a) my services had been suspended, which they hadn’t.
b) demanding full payment from me, despite multiple communications recorded into Telstra between myself
and the entity I agreed to do business with, i.e. Telstra.
c) despite a weekly payment plan in place and consistently followed
d) threat of late fees and disconnection fees
e) threats to remove my number altogether
f) threats that Telstra will take further action
Fee for issuing threats to harm: $5 000 000
And follows is the ludicrous privacy statement of this psychopathic pirate in our community.
4) I have no recollection of giving my Power of Attorney to this parasite, thus rendering me to be it’s
slave and thus free to be treated in the above manner. And yet it seems to be in possession of my
Power of Attorney. How did that occur? Through slight of hand and zero transparency, thus deeming this deceptive contract with Telstra null and void. $1 000 000
5) If D & B’s existence and alleged authorities were buried in my agreement with Telstra then it has acted in FRAUD,
and has colluded with Telstra with intent to deceive and to harvest not only data about me, but profit from me,
whilst granting itself the right to harm me.
This is blatant slavery. $5 000 000
Privacy Statement – Sections in RED, highlight corporate psychopathic slave mentality of alleged power, that has merely been stolen.
Dun & Bradstreet (Australia) Pty Ltd ACN 006 399 677 (D&B) has collected personal information about the individual to whom this letter has been addressed (You) from the organisation named on the other side of this letter who has instructed us to contact You (Our Client).
= Harvesting data without consent: $2 000 000
D&B collects personal information about You for the purpose of carrying out debt collection activities, including instituting legal proceedings on behalf of Our Client. If some, or all, of your personal information is not collected by D&B, D&B may be unable to assist with resolving this matter and enforcement action may be escalated by Our Client.
= Threat to harm based on a private legal system of treason, fraud and slavery $5 000 000
Your personal information will be stored for the purpose of data matching and future debt collection activities. D&B will also collect, hold and use personal information for planning and research purposes, but for these purposes it uses and produces aggregate or de-identified data.
Use of my personal details without transparent, wet signature agreement
= theft and slavery. $2 000 000
D&B will usually disclose personal information about You to our Client, Courts, Tribunals and organisations D&B instructs to do things on its behalf (such as process servers, mailing houses and lawyers).
= Delusional perception of ownership and rights over an individual. = slavery. $5 000 000
Dun & Bradstreet (New Zealand) Ltd is a related company that does things on behalf of D&B. New Zealand has similar privacy laws to Australia. Information about debtors is never sent outside Australia and New Zealand. D&B does not use call centres on other countries for collection purposes.
Generally, D&B will allow You to access information D&B holds about You by contacting D&B on telephone number 132 333. D&B will aim to provide access to such information within a reasonable period after the request is made. Where permitted by law, D&B may charge you a fee in certain circumstances.
Alleging to hold superior claim over personal details than the individual and extorting funds for access to details. $2 000 000
Sometimes D&B will refuse to give you access to information (e.g. you have not verified your identity). If it does it will provide you with the reason for its decision.
6) So in light of that, let me be 100% clear to D&B.
a) I have no wet ink signed contract to do business with you.
b) You have zero Power of Attorney in any matters related to me and are commanded to exit my environment immediately and ‘unrecorded’ any data you believe you have the privilege to hold.
c) You may not harm me in any way without the fees here, actioned against you.
d) You are wholly fraudulent in our communities and exist by breaking the Law.
e) Refer to the other published matter referencing your conduct with a focus on Telstra behaviour.
f) All data is published on the net for community education so that others may not be held to account for your FRAUD.
Total Pending: $29 000 000