Australian Taxation Office

Registered Business # CIK#:
Respondent T&C Ref: Other
Chris Jordan
CINK70654142 Invoice1
Robert Ravanello
TJCD000012Letter from Robert Ravanello-ATO-Asst Commissioner Dec 2015CN – Robert Ravanello
Notice – Robert Ravanello
(Aust Post Reg ID 942121051014)
INV#3 TJCD000012
Erin Holland
09042013_1 Inv6032013-1
Michael Monaghan
Inv1 TJCD000012-MM

See also: 
Australian Taxation Office – Illegal?
Australian Taxation Office
Australian Government Misleading About Taxation
Australian Tax Office is unlawful
John Zukerman, Probe Group, ATO Illegal


Dun & Bradstreet -Telstra & ATO

Respondent T&C Ref: Other
Gareth Jones Gareth Jones-CN-DNB-GJ (5mb) Gareth Jones DnB 07.05.15 Incls:
*Affidavit from ATO Officer Antony Wallace
*Top 10 Facts about ATO
*Court Evidence ATO is not a Legal Entity
*Extract – Letter from TaxPayers to ATO in March 2011
* Request for PII details “Acting In Commerce


CEO – Gareth Jones. 

Dun and Bradstreet – Operating in Treason, Fraud and Slavery. 

This parasite in our community ‘alleges’ to have rights and jurisdiction over YOU.   FALSE.
How does it think it acquired that?
It broke the Law and is using you as a debt slave to generate a profit for itself.
It is wholly false in it’s presumption that you are willingly embroiled in it’s debt slavery game.
Rather, you are engaged in it’s debt slavery game under duress, since any attempt to create a people owned currency, as opposed to the current PRIVATELY owned currency, does result in assassination.  Just refer to the history of JFK or Abraham Lincoln.
And if one needs access to community resources that have fallen into corporate hands they must agree to contracts under duress to access such resources.  These contracts have nasty parasites lurking in them like Dun and Bradstreet.
Which Maxim of Law does Dun and Bradstreet break to carve out it’s filthy existence from the cobbled slave streets of old London:
1.Doctrine of Privity
A valid contract (if one exists) is a private relationship between the parties who make it, and no other person can acquire rights or incur liabilities under it.
2. Scope of Doctrine. The Doctrine of Privity has two aspects.
a. No one can acquire rights under a contract to which he is not a party.
b. No one can incur liabilities under a contract to which he is not a party. 
CONTRACT LAW is one of the most clear cut and unambiguous LAWS that there is.  In many cases the LAW and more specifically CONTRACT LAW  insisted upon to be written, that even a lay man, would and could understand it.  Thus it is a very solid foundation of LAW.
Let’s see, who is the current nut case occupying the position of CEO for Dun and Bradstreet and inevitably earning far too much money for committing acts of treason, fraud and slavery in community. That would be Gareth Jones.
So today 17.8.15, Dun and Bradstreet entered my life after Telstra SOLD my account to them, like I am it’s peasant slave and it can just do that.  So what might Dun and Bradstreet think it has right to do to my life.   Well let’s take a look below.  The list of HARM and INJURY, is impressive despite a long track record of a weekly payments with Telstra.  Ho Hum Telstra, you are the subject of many other posts of your fraudulent contracts that allegedly grant Dun and Bradstreet access to enter my life.   How irresponsible are you, and how willing to engage in breaking the law for your fake, fraudulent status as a private corporation with private profits, shareholder dividends and grossly overpaid CEO.   Telstra was a community resource.  It is gross fraud to allege to be able to sell it back tot he people who already owned it.
So let’s see what costs Dun and Bradstreet have racked up today, 17.8.15 attempting to extort business out of me WITHOUT MY CONSENT.
1) A phone call from 08 8010 7000 at 12.25pm AWST, attempting to create joynder to the legal fiction thus deeming me a slave: $1 000 000
2) A txt message at 1.10pm AWST alleging to have very important business to discuss with me: $1 000 000
3) An email delivered to my inbox at 12.59pm AWST telling me:
a)  my services had been suspended, which they hadn’t.
b) demanding full payment from me, despite multiple communications recorded into Telstra between myself
and the entity I agreed to do business with, i.e. Telstra.
c) despite a weekly payment plan in place and consistently followed
d) threat of late fees and disconnection fees
e) threats to remove my number altogether
f) threats that Telstra will take further action
Fee for issuing threats to harm:  $5 000 000 
And follows is the ludicrous privacy statement of this psychopathic pirate in our community. 
But first, 
4) I have no recollection of giving my Power of Attorney to this parasite, thus rendering me to be it’s 
slave and thus free to be treated in the above manner.   And yet it seems to be in possession of my 
Power of Attorney.  How did that occur?  Through slight of hand and zero transparency, thus deeming this deceptive contract with Telstra null and void.  $1 000 000  
5) If D & B’s existence and alleged authorities were buried in my agreement with Telstra then it has acted in FRAUD, 
and has colluded with Telstra with intent to deceive and to harvest not only data about me, but profit from me, 
whilst granting itself the right to harm me. 
This is blatant slavery.  $5 000 000

Privacy Statement  – Sections in RED, highlight corporate psychopathic slave mentality of alleged power, that has merely been stolen. 

Dun & Bradstreet (Australia) Pty Ltd ACN 006 399 677 (D&B) has collected personal information about the individual to whom this letter has been addressed (You) from the organisation named on the other side of this letter who has instructed us to contact You (Our Client).

= Harvesting data without consent:  $2 000 000

D&B collects personal information about You for the purpose of carrying out debt collection activities, including instituting legal proceedings on behalf of Our Client. If some, or all, of your personal information is not collected by D&B, D&B may be unable to assist with resolving this matter and enforcement action may be escalated by Our Client. 

= Threat to harm based on a private legal system of treason, fraud and slavery    $5 000 000

Your personal information will be stored for the purpose of data matching and future debt collection activities. D&B will also collect, hold and use personal information for planning and research purposes, but for these purposes it uses and produces aggregate or de-identified data.

Use of my personal details without transparent, wet signature agreement 
= theft and slavery.  $2 000 000

D&B will usually disclose personal information about You to our Client, Courts, Tribunals and organisations D&B instructs to do things on its behalf (such as process servers, mailing houses and lawyers). 

= Delusional perception of ownership and rights over an individual.  = slavery. $5 000 000

Dun & Bradstreet (New Zealand) Ltd is a related company that does things on behalf of D&B. New Zealand has similar privacy laws to Australia. Information about debtors is never sent outside Australia and New Zealand. D&B does not use call centres on other countries for collection purposes.

Generally, D&B will allow You to access information D&B holds about You by contacting D&B on telephone number 132 333. D&B will aim to provide access to such information within a reasonable period after the request is made. Where permitted by law, D&B may charge you a fee in certain circumstances.

Alleging to hold superior claim over personal details than the individual and extorting funds for access to details.  $2 000 000

Sometimes D&B will refuse to give you access to information (e.g. you have not verified your identity). If it does it will provide you with the reason for its decision.

For more information about how you can access your personal information held by D&B, how you can seek the correction of such information, and D&B’s complaints handling procedure, view our Privacy Policy at

6) So in light of that, let me be 100% clear to D&B.   
a) I have no wet ink signed contract to do business with you. 
b) You have zero Power of Attorney in any matters related to me and are commanded to exit my environment immediately and ‘unrecorded’ any data you believe you have the privilege to hold. 
c) You may not harm me in any way without the fees here, actioned against you. 
d) You are wholly fraudulent in our communities and exist by breaking the Law. 
e) Refer to the other published matter referencing your conduct with a focus on Telstra behaviour. 
f) All data is published on the net for community education so that others may not be held to account for your FRAUD. 
Total Pending:  $29 000 000

Australian Government Misleading About Taxation

The Australian Government is misleading us about taxation.


The Australian people are being sorely deceived by their government.

In fact, deceived is probably too mild a word!

For years politicians, senior judiciary and many, many lawyers have known that the ATO is illegal.

And no-one, and I mean not one person, wants to do anything about it.

While they ‘sit on their hands’ the people are being seriously oppressed by this entity that does not even exist. Since its so-called inception in 1974 senior tax officers have been earning juicy bonuses based on the size of the assessment (illegal) notices issued to taxpayers – regardless of their accuracy, or should I say inaccuracy. Many of these assessments are wildly inflated and would be thrown out of a court.

Politicians, complicit with the ATO have legislated to tie the court’s hands.

If the ATO issue an assessment notice the court has not choice other than to enforce a judgement on the hapless taxpayer – regardless of the notice’s accuracy. Lawyers call it the ‘pay now, fight later’ strategy.

It should be called the ‘tie both hands behind their back so they can’t fight’ strategy.

After all, if the ATO has taken all your money, sold all your assets (often in a ‘fire sale’) what do you have left to fight them with? Lawyers want to be paid before they will fight for you.

If this is not oppressing the people, I don’t know what is!

Australia is rotting – and this rot needs to be exposed. If the people (read media / blogs with strong followings here) don’t stand up they will become a part of this cancer!

Many blogs have massive readerships and are quite influential, especially now that so many Australians despair about the ‘state of the nation’. Many are saying ‘can’t wait until the election so that we can get rid of this incompetent government’ etc. etc. and ‘I don’t know how this country can recover from the debt amassed over the last 6 or so years.’

However, the malaise goes deeper than just one political party.

And waiting until an election won’t change much.

Australians needs to get out from under the ever increasing burden of taxes and debt. It won’t happen unless the people demand it.

And the people won’t demand it unless they learn the truth.

Some facts about the Australian Taxation Office (ATO):

Preface: All law in Australia must be passed by a Parliament in both houses (in states that have both houses) and then by law must be gazetted.

Fact: The law that established the Australian Taxation Office has been challenged in a particular court. The Plaintiff created the need to document the ATO’s formation to the satisfaction of the Defendant and the Court.

The Plaintiff, with the approval of the Australian National Library, brought into the court every Federal Government Gazette for the time period around when the law (taxation) was passed by the Federal Parliament. The Defendant was then asked to ‘Please show us in which Gazette we will find the Legislation regarding the Australian Taxation Office’ to which the Defendant stated; ‘it is not in any Government Gazette’,

The judge of the matter then stated; ‘You have proved beyond any doubt that the law establishing the Australian Taxation Office has not been Gazetted and thus place its legality in question’.

Further, Justice J Callinan, in Moelike v Chapman [B8/2000 (24/8/2000)], agreed that the ATO was not a legal entity. This has been validated by two judges.

Since this case, an article from the Aussie POST quotes the High Court case on May 17, where the ATO admitted it isn’t a legal personality, a view also held by the presiding judge, JusticeCallinan.

It goes further, stating “at the heart of the matter is the inability of the ATO to provide any documentation that proves it is either a legal entity, or was established following correct procedure…”.

Further, a response by Anthony Wallace, of the ATO, to Mr D Cameron on February 25, 2000, in an affidavit, stated that the writer and others he contacted could not identify any relevant files or documents establishing the ATO.

The Australian Government has grossly misled the people of Australia in matters relating to taxation.

Attached is an extract from a letter from oppressed taxpayers to the ATO in March 2011, along with attachments referred to in the body of this letter. To date, there has been no response by the ATO to the taxpayers concerned. Instead the ATO continues to forge ahead with their stated intention to take every single asset.

Be warned: This is not an isolated incident. Sadly, it is an all too common story, although this case is even worse than most….

Without ‘ordinary’ Australians taking action, creating a groundswell against this tyranny, it will continue unchecked. And when this type of action is allowed to continue it will escalate. For people who believe they are above the law become more and more bold in their coercion of those they see as powerless!

It has been written that all that is needed for evil to flourish is for ‘good’ men to do nothing – and history shows that this is the truth.

It may be insidious here in Australia, but none the less it is evil.

I plead with you to become a part of the solution, rather than be seduced into thinking you cannot do anything to stop it.

And so I end with the allegory of the frog in the pot of water.

A frog can easily leap from a pot of water. And is likely to do so if the water is too hot (uncomfortable). However if the water is cool, the frog sees no reason to jump out.

So if one wants to cook the frog, just put it into a pot of cool water. Place it onto the hotplate, turn the power on to it’s lowest setting and slowly, slowly the water temperature will rise. The frog will NOT leap from the pot to safety.


Because the rise in temperature has been so gradual, it never even noticed. It remained comfortable while it was being slowly cooked.

Then, please ask yourself, am I being slowly ‘cooked’?

And if you begin to feel just a little uncomfortable, maybe even before reading the attachments, then maybe it’s time to read them, and then do some more research for yourself – all the evidence is out there for anyone prepared to look….