For Alleged Traffic Offences – Gary Doyle Orders

Judges are not happy …

“What we are doing, seems to be having an impact on the Courts. Judges are up in arms, because of Lay Litigants directing the Courts to issue Gary Doyle Orders.” The Common Law Society  - Irelend

Last week, we got a report back from one Lay Litigant, whereby the Judge maintained that he did not know what a Gary Doyle Order was … when the Lay Litigant explained what it was, and that he was entitled to ALL the Evidence that the prosecution was reliant upon as per the “DPP Guidelines for Prosecutors” … the Judge went berserk, and ordered the Lay Litigant to leave the Court, and never come back (unsurprisingly, the case was withdrawn by the Garda and the DPP).

More and more People every day are reading the book “The Gary Doyle Order”, and it seems that more People want and/or have a need to learn how to validly defend themselves in Court, when it comes to “Minor Criminal Offences” or “Summary Offences”.

Most People do not realise or are not aware, that all alleged offences under the “Road Traffic Act” are of a Criminal nature*, and things that seem as innocious as TV Licences and/or alleged Toll road offences are treated or deemed to be of a Criminal nature.

If nothing else, in all cases … EVERYONE should seek a Gary Doyle Order from the Court(s) … very few if any Solicitors or Barristers seek such an Order, as they just wish and want to go with the flow of the Court, and don’t want to be seen to advocate in favour of the People whom they are supposed to represent.

* Also true in Australia

Why Witnesses Can Lie In Court

(For your interest, reading and further research we have included below an extract from the book “The Gary Doyle Order”. Please do take the time to read it, digest it, and do some further independent research on it.)

Then Garda Mahony took the stand,

… and was muttering what was probably the oath, or swearing on the Bible. Swearing on a Bible and/or taking an oath is quite an ironic thing to do, if you are planning to tell the truth. As far as we can ascertain; this from the position of being totally a-religious, and of no religious denomination or affiliation, this swearing of oaths and/or making affirmations is a massive contradiction in terms. Anyone that has read and/or studied the Bible will know that NOWHERE in the Bible or in any holy books does it state that oaths must be taken, or affirmations given. In fact the very opposite is true.

It states in Matthew 5:33-37 |    33 “Again, you have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘Do not break your oath, but fulfill to the Lord the vows you have made.’ 34 But I tell you, do not swear an oath at all: either by heaven, for it is God’s throne; 35 or by the earth, for it is his footstool; or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the Great King. 36 And do not swear by your head, for you cannot make even one hair white or black. 37 All you need to say is simply ‘Yes’ or ‘No’; anything beyond this comes from the evil one, or from evil”.

And in Matthew 5:34 | 34 “But I say to you, Do not take an oath at all, either by heaven, for it is the throne of God”. And in James 5:12 | 12 “But above all, my brothers, do not swear, either by heaven or by earth or by any other oath,but let your “yes” be yes and your “no” be no, so that you may not fall under condemnation”.

There are probably many other references contained within the Bible and a great many holy books, pertaining to NOT taking Oaths and/or NOT giving affirmations. This after all, according to the Bible … “anything beyond this comes from the evil one, or from evil”.

If you have stood or sat for just one day in any Court on this Island (as an observer), you will see the evil that is perpetrated upon People, even if you are not aware of any material contained within any of the holy books, you will know and recognise evil when you see and hear it. | The Common Law Society | 12 Parnell Street | Waterford, Waterford County 0000, Ireland